Based Batman

There’s a…joke?…about GamerGate in Batman: Arkham Knight, and maybe it’s just that it’s a Riddler-like conundrum that my puny, Batman-level intellect is incapable of understanding, but…I don’t get it. What exactly is the joke here?
Here’s how it reads:
“Y do u attack B@tman? He is BASED! U r a fa-”
Riddler deleted the email, and all the others like it, as prickly hot anger and shame squirmed through his insides. No point in denying it: #CrusaderGate had been a disastrous social media campaign.
He couldn’t understand it. It seemed the internet’s idiotic and easily roused rabble could froth itself into a full-fat cappuccino of frenzy over “white knights.” But offer it up a Dark one — on a plate! — and you get a soy latte’s worth of indignation at best! Didn’t they understand what Batman had done?
It’s not clearly pro-GamerGate. The text in the email Riddler deletes is written in such a way as to conjure images of losers who spend all their time leaving angry comments on the internet. But it’s hardly clearly anti-GamerGate, either. Riddler characterizes them as “the internet’s idiotic and easily roused rabble,” but Riddler is always wrong. Riddler, in his arrogance, thinks he’s smarter than Batman, and Batman proves him wrong again and again. Batman is BASED, like GamerGate’s leaders and ideological heroes, and indeed, Arkham Knight, in which you play as a grim white man who must employ brutal violence to maintain order and in which women are repeatedly objectified and victimized, is essentially the Platonic ideal of the “video game” as GamerGate wishes to defend and preserve it, a tremendously right-wing game (I actually heard one criminal boasting to another about how they have more rights than the victims in the legal system) that many who play it won’t see as political at all. What would it even mean for this game to openly criticize GamerGate, while so thoroughly in its narrative and ideology being the kind of game that contributed to the culture that gave rise to GamerGate in the first place?
So is this joke punching up? Punching down? It’s “whatever you want it to be,” I guess. The joke here seems to simply be, “Hey, remember that thing that happened that you may have strong feelings about? We’re aware of that thing and are referencing it!”
It’s punching sideways. It’s flailing. It’s a punch in the dark.
Notes
icecreamjones reblogged this from carolynpetit
icecreamjones liked this verbnouner-blog liked this
queertpi reblogged this from femhype
daxolotl liked this
traumahound liked this
sufferingpariah liked this jkrincon reblogged this from carolynpetit
jkrincon liked this
flightofthefaeriedragon reblogged this from femhype
flightofthefaeriedragon liked this
frangiblekilljoy liked this
firebomb173 liked this sammyjank1s reblogged this from carolynpetit and added:
Oh DC comics. Sigh. It’s like low hanging fruit. Is this surprising to anyone? Consider that arguably DC’s most popular...
davedoesthis liked this
feministgamingmatters reblogged this from femhype
mechreviewstech reblogged this from torenbacht
mechreviewstech liked this
torenbacht reblogged this from carolynpetit and added:
Actually I see it targeted both sides evenly considering anti-GamerGate usually joke saying “it’s actually about ethics...
sageaisling liked this
matyrsstuff liked this
gpoj liked this yetisized liked this
sapphicshimmers liked this
squirrel-atwar liked this
sudfemdad liked this
inevitablefragments liked this
notmeantforthis liked this rainvillep liked this
ranmara reblogged this from carolynpetit
theskidiot reblogged this from carolynpetit
gaberlungi liked this
dimsumstudy liked this
ecstaticcommodores reblogged this from feministbatman
itsskoots liked this
audio-video-disco liked this
existentialcryysis liked this astraeus-nox reblogged this from carolynpetit
carolynpetit posted this
- Show more notes